Mr. Fagg (yes that is his name) from an expensive Union Busting firm in Seattle was there as an "observer." Well, not really... they actually played "Good Cop, Bad Cop" through the meeting..
But wait, wasn't Mr. Fagg saying that GFES could not say things because they would be breaking the law?
A few problems:
- Having a mandatory meeting to discuss and try to sway your vote is a violation of the law. The National Labor Relations Act Section 8(a)(1) prohibits such meetings... GFES IS BREAKING THE LAW!
- Promising ANYTHING of value such as raises or better treatment to influence a N0 Union vote violates NLRA Section 8(a)(1). GFES IS BREAKING THE LAW!
- Threats, Warnings, or Orders to refrain from protected union activity violate Section 8(a)(1). GFES IS BREAKING THE LAW!
- The payment of back overtime hours in an attempt to influence a No Union vote violates Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA. GFES IS BREAKING THE LAW!
- The repair of stations and equipment in an attempt to influence a No Union vote violates NLRA Section 8(a)(1). GFES IS BREAKING THE LAW!
What is so horrible about NEMSA that Kuhn and Vandersloot would violate Federal Law to keep NEMSA out of your workplace?
It's great that the owners are making changes and NEMSA is all for anything to better your working conditions. However if any of these things have been done to try to sway your vote then GFES is breaking the law.
Do you think that all these things are happening out of the goodwill and charity of the owners?
The only true way to better your working conditions, wages, and benefits is to VOTE YES TO NEMSA REPRESENTATION!
No comments:
Post a Comment